User talk:Nutshinou

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Nutshinou!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:22, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

???

Why do you want to delete my File:Spongebob imagination.jpg image? I had modified the image slightly by cropping it and after all, it is a meme. So it is for public use. This makes no sense.

However, I am not forcing you not to nominate it for deletion. It is for the public after all.

Doctorine Dark (talk) 12:21, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Contact me on Wikipedia! Doctorine Dark (talk) 12:21, 13 August 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doctorine Dark (talk • contribs) 12:23, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Doctorine Dark (talk • contribs) 12:24, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

I'm not the best at explaining so here's an official policy that would perhaps your question (also, something being a meme does not mean it isn't under copyright anymore), though if you have anything against that you should probably say something on the deletion request entry --Nutshinou ^Talk! 14:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

monche

tu est gentil

COM:SELFIE

Hi. Thanks for nominating selfies for deletion. In future, you can nominate them for speedy deletion under F10 - personal photos by non contributors. {{CSD|F10}} Thanks Gbawden (talk) 11:04, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

thank you. I'm not used to speedy deletions yet but I'll try doing this next time --Nutshinou ^Talk! 11:31, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Eiffel Tower at night This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:500px photo (38900992).jpeg

And also:

• File:500px photo (38901000).jpeg

Yours sincerely, Dronebogus (talk) 13:17, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Zambia - Location Map (2011) - ZMB - UNOCHA.svg

File:Zambia - Location Map (2011) - ZMB - UNOCHA.svg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Zambia - Location Map (2011) - ZMB - UNOCHA.s… This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

182.2.170.253 11:50, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Western Sahara - Location Map (2013) - ESH - UNOCHA.svg

File:Western Sahara - Location Map (2013) - ESH - UNOCHA.svg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Western Sahara - Location Map (2013) - ESH - … This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Heraldrist (talk) 07:33, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:21, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you aswellǃ --Nutshinou ^Talk! 10:59, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Please be careful when making categories hidden

Dear Nutshinou, I noticed that today you made some categories "hidden categories". But if you do so, the files in them, will get the category "Media needing categories as of ..." if they have no regular category. And that was exactly the reason why all these files are put into a category "to be categorised", like Category:RAA images Den Helder 1905-1940 to be categorised. So please do not do so anymore, unless you are absolutely sure that it won't do any harm. JopkeB (talk) 13:59, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

But if they are placed in this category, they are counted as "categorized" even though they should not be (because they need to be categorized)? This is the reason why these categories should be hidden instead of being regular categories Nutshinou ^Talk! 18:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

But then you should do something about the progam/code that adds automatically a category "Media needing categories as of ..." to files with no regular categories, to make an exception for files with hidden categories with "to be categorised" in the title. Until that problem is fixed, I propose to stop adding "hidden categories" to these categories. --JopkeB (talk) 02:15, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Not necessarily, the files are not categorized (other than a maintenance category), so they should go into the "Media needing categories as of" categories, and if the files gets categorized, they should be removed from both categories (like all the other hidden categories that contain files "to be categorized") Nutshinou ^Talk! 11:31, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

But that is the whole point: we (at least I) do not want hundreds or thousands of files, all about one broad subject, to be in a category "Media needing categories as of ...", which is very general. We do not want other people to bother about categorising these file, but only the uploader and people who he/she is working with. That is why we park these files in an intermediate-category like Category:RAA images Den Helder 1905-1940 to be categorised. --JopkeB (talk) 15:54, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Category:Argiope gallicus

File:Argiope gallicus.jpg

Did you ever see a winged spider? I didn't before and I am quite shure thas someone photoshopped wings and abdomen from some wasp on the body and legs of a spider. Kersti (talk) 16:28, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Oh, my bad, only now I notice that detail and the usage of this file on other wikis Nutshinou ^Talk! 17:57, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Use of time

can you spend your time on things better than eating images 82.3.101.179 00:26, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Rename request for File:09062-Bordes-Uchentein-argile.png

This rename request has been declined for reason 2 in Criteria to decline. The original image name is French and means "Bordes-Uchentein-clay" where Bordes-Uchentein is a region of France. The decline extends to the other 09062-Bordes-Uchentein-xxx files as well.

Thank you for your suggestion and please continue to recommend files that require renaming. Epolk (talk) 23:31, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Category:Files_from_Flickr_(uncategorized_2022)

Category:Files_from_Flickr_(uncategorized_2022) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 18:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Category:Files_from_Flickr_(uncategorized_2013)

Category:Files_from_Flickr_(uncategorized_2013) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 18:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Category:Files_from_Flickr_(uncategorized_2012)

Category:Files_from_Flickr_(uncategorized_2012) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 18:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Category:Files_from_Flickr_(uncategorized_2011)

Category:Files_from_Flickr_(uncategorized_2011) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 18:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Category:Files_from_Flickr_(uncategorized_2010)

Category:Files_from_Flickr_(uncategorized_2010) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 18:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Category:Files_from_Flickr_(uncategorized_2009)

Category:Files_from_Flickr_(uncategorized_2009) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 18:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

i love you

Imabathbomb (talk) 20:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Deletion requests

Hi, You need a proof to nominate a file for speedy deletion. Files like File:Partenza Race for the Cure 2023.jpg are most probably the uploader's work, so they are not eligible for speedy deletion. Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for letting me know. What I found weird is that in the metadata of this file, the "Copyright holder" field reads "Paola Capparella" (which doesn't correspond with the uploader's username), this is not the case for the other files uploaded by said user (with all of them also having varying/inconsistent metadata). Nutshinou ^Talk! 18:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Com:Duplicate

Hi. The speedy criteria is reasonable strict and exact duplicate does NOT include other file types.  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Noted, thank you, will avoid any similar speedy nominations in the future. -- Nutshinou ^Talk! 12:26, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

I am again back here to point to this guidance. Exact duplicate is required for speedy deletion, so would you please reacquaint yourself with the page. Different versions of the same image are allowable at Commons, and where you believe that they are superfluous, then the process is a normal deletion, not trying to push it through as a speedy deletion. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:22, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

My general way that this could be considered is, if we are truly are limiting someone's choice of what they are selecting then we are probably NOT in the exact duplicate space.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:32, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Copyright deletion of Godus photo

Hi, I just seen you put the image I published as it has copyright, I’m new at Wikipedia so sorry if I did something wrong, how I could delete the photo so it not cause more problems? LOPEZwas (talk) 15:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, no worries, the image should be deleted shortly as I already tagged it appropriately. -- Nutshinou ^Talk! 17:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Group photograph at Tennoji Miyako Hotel in Dec 2010.jpg

 

Pay attention to licensing

Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. File:Group photograph at Tennoji Miyako Hotel in Dec 2010.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file. If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

The reason given by the user who added this tag is: How is this ineligible for copyright?

Sinigh (talk) 15:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

"I find Commons making it very easy to host and fabricate hoaxes most unfortunate (e.g. uploading fictitious flags and adding them to a sparsely populated place where no one will see/check.)"

I feel like the only way to solve this issue would be to bring it up on Meta. There is little Commons can do about it Trade (talk) 14:27, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Category:Files_from_Flickr_(uncategorized_2014)

Category:Files_from_Flickr_(uncategorized_2014) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

com:speedy delete

Would you please reread this guidance. Admins cannot speedy delete items in use for supposed advertising, they need a DR.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:19, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

These aren't in use per COM:INUSE ("An otherwise non-educational file does not acquire educational purpose solely [...] because it is in use on a user page (the "User:" namespace)") but sure, I'll open a deletion request for such cases. Nutshinou ^Talk! 23:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Actually, seems like it was a mistake on your part (no other sysops consider spam not to be eligible for speedy deletion even if it's used on the uploader's userpage, per aforementioned policy) and since I'm opening a considerable number of deletion requests, I'm going to stop Nutshinou ^Talk! 17:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Francesco Graziani, Fiorentina.jpg

File:Francesco Graziani, Fiorentina.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Francesco Graziani, Fiorentina.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Günther Frager (talk) 15:10, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Related DRs

When you make three or more related DRs, as you did with uploads by User:Ssanny1885, please use Visual File Change. It will save you a lot of time in making the DRs and the closing Admin a lot of time in closing them. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:21, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Phoebe Dighton, Shakespeare

You nominated two images here for deletion as duplicates. I don’t have a problem with that. What I have a problem with, is your deleting files, without ensuring that the full template data is transferred to the permanent file first? Do you ensure that is the case before nominating files for deletion? Broichmore (talk) 07:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

I do transfer data to the original files when tagging duplicates files if it's useful yes, but here it didn't seem like there was anything relevant ("Source: Internet" isn't better than what is on the bigger file), other than the author, who I added the category for and would've added as part of the infobox if I could. Looking at other files in Category:Illustrations from Gartenlaube, it seems like there is no way to add an author to the {{Gartenlaube}} template. Nutshinou ^Talk! 12:19, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Photo non utilisée

Bonjour, Je fais suite à votre notification de suppression d'une de mes photos uploadée sur Wikimédia ; vous pouvez la supprimer sans problème ! MΛNO (talk) 01:02, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Please be more careful with deletions

Several of my files were deleted by you, citing copyright violations. For the last three files you were correct (thank you very much for that), but for others they were actually either CC BY-SA or CC0, and were marked as such in their corresponding iNaturalist entries. If you could restore them, that would be very appreciated. Bloopityboop (talk) 07:02, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Very sorry about this, when I tagged the files I thought the licensing of the observation was the same as the licensing of the images, I figured that I made a mistake a bit after the files were deleted, and I meant to request undeletion of them, but forgot to do it. -- Nutshinou ^Talk! 09:34, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Possible copyright violation

Good afternnon, Nutshinou. You left five messages on my talk page regarding five possible copyright violations, stating "No evidence of a free license at the claimed source". The files depict a Portuguese singer and have, as per my operandi, derived from Agência Lusa's Youtube page. All of my uploads credit the channel and the 3.0 nature of the upload. If there is something wrong, or that I forgot during the upload, I would hope you would let me know, as I don't see a copyright violation. Thank you for the attention. Earl of Gotland (talk) 15:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

@Earl of Gotland Yes, that was my mistake. I undid the edits where I tagged the files shortly after, but did not undo the edits on your talk page (might've forgot about that.) I have already done so for all your uploads, but for future reference any files sourced from a YouTube video should use the template {{YouTube}} for licensing (rather than the default {{Cc-by-3.0}}) and {{LicenseReview}} for a sysop or license reviewer to confirm that the license at the YouTube link is valid (for example in case the video gets removed.) Thank you and happy editing! Nutshinou ^Talk! 15:35, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

No problem! I just uploaded a better version of one of the previous photographs and I am adding the template onwards. Wishing you a good year. Earl of Gotland (talk) 15:39, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Krishnakumarsinhji Kirpalsinh Gohil.png

Request for Clarification on File Deletion

Dear Nutshinou,

I noticed that you have marked File:Krishnakumarsinhjigohil.jpg for speedy deletion under CSD F10. I would like to understand more about the issue and, if possible, resolve it.

The photo in question belongs to me, and I have full rights to upload it to Wikimedia Commons. I am willing to provide the necessary documentation or permissions to verify my ownership and comply with Wikimedia’s licensing policies.

Could you please let me know what steps I need to take to address this situation? I greatly appreciate your assistance and guidance.

Thank you for your time and support.

Best regards, Krishnakumarsinhji Gohil Krishnakumarsinhjigohil (talk) 00:37, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Файл логотип каналу Піксель

Прошу залишити файл а не вилучати Олег Гарбуз 2008 (talk) 10:19, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Pixel UA (2012).svg Олег Гарбуз 2008 (talk) 10:20, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletions of files like File:Cecil Brown - 386432591a.jpg

Hi. I'm not claiming to know the answer to this or anything, but wouldn't images like File:Cecil Brown - 386432591a.jpg generally not be copyrightable since their essentially unoriginal depictions of the original work? Like if someone uploads a photograph of a postcard that's PD from eBay then that photograph is also PD because it's not original in it's own right. I don't really see how this would be any different. Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 09:07, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Adamant1, seems like you already got your question answered at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Copyrightability_of_generic_photographs_of_objects: you are correct, but that is only the case with 2D works unfortunately (see COM:DW), whereas I am only tagging 3D works and photographs "featuring" 2D works, except those that could be cropped. I tried to be as lenient as possible, especially with flat photographs of 3D objects, but if you find anything weird please challenge the nomination - I do not expect there to not be anything "out of place" to other people, especially after having tagged over 2 thousand files. Nutshinou ^Talk! 14:20, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

A clean table focusing on the list of countries with the capacity of researchers per million

Here is the table focusing on the list of countries with the capacity of researchers per million.

Rank	Country	Number of researchers per million	Year
1	Israel	8,255.40	2012
2	Denmark	8,065.89	2018
3	Korea	7,980.40	2018
4	Sweden	7,536.48	2018
5	Finland	6,861.11	2018
6	Singapore	6,802.54	2017
7	Norway	6,466.70	2018
8	Iceland	6,130.51	2017
9	Austria	5,733.08	2018
10	Netherlands	5,604.54	2018
11	New Zealand	5,529.52	2017
12	Switzerland	5,450.43	2017
13	Japan	5,331.15	2018
14	Ireland	5,243.13	2018
15	Germany	5,211.87	2018
16	Belgium	5,023.26	2018
17	Luxembourg	4,941.70	2018
18	Slovenia	4,854.57	2018
19	France	4,715.32	2018
20	United Kingdom	4,603.31	2018
21	Portugal	4,537.53	2018
22	Australia	4,532.40	2010
23	United States	4,412.44	2017
24	Canada	4,325.65	2017
25	Hong Kong SAR, China	4,026.60	2018
26	Czech Republic	3,862.67	2018
27	Estonia	3,755.33	2018
28	Macao SAR, China	3,543.21	2018
29	Greece	3,482.72	2018
30	Hungary	3,237.70	2018
31	Lithuania	3,190.70	2018
32	Poland	3,106.12	2018
33	Spain	3,000.89	2018
34	Slovak Republic	2,995.96	2018
35	Russia	2,784.33	2018
36	United Arab Emirates	2,378.89	2018
37	Bulgaria	2,342.87	2018
38	Italy	2,306.77	2018
39	Malaysia	2,184.72	2018
40	Serbia	2,087.22	2018
41	Malta	1,946.51	2018
42	Croatia	1,921.13	2018
43	Latvia	1,792.10	2018
44	Tunisia	1,771.61	2018
45	Iran	1,474.91	2017
46	Georgia	1,463.77	2018
47	Turkey	1,379.41	2017
48	Thailand	1,350.34	2017
49	China	1,307.12	2018
50	Cyprus	1,255.85	2018
51	Argentina	1,211.42	2018
52	Morocco	1,073.54	2016
53	Ukraine	988.08	2018
54	Brazil	887.68	2014
55	Romania	882.44	2018
56	Algeria	819.34	2017
57	North Macedonia	799.27	2018
58	Montenegro	734.3	2018
59	Vietnam	707.74	2017
60	Greenland	701.71	2004
61	Uruguay	696.38	2018
62	Moldova	696.08	2018
63	Egypt	686.72	2018
64	Kazakhstan	666.94	2018
65	Jordan	595.96	2017
66	Qatar	577.35	2018
67	Trinidad and Tobago	566.97	2018
68	Senegal	564.34	2015
69	South Africa	517.72	2017
70	Kuwait	513.86	2018
71	Chile	493.3	2017
72	Uzbekistan	476.18	2018
73	Mauritius	473.85	2018
74	Bosnia and Herzegovina	471.25	2018
75	Ecuador	399.49	2014
76	Bahrain	368.99	2014
77	Puerto Rico	348.36	2015
78	Costa Rica	345.04	2018
79	Pakistan	335.58	2017
80	Mexico	315.26	2016
81	Venezuela	300.26	2016
82	Monaco	295.48	2005
83	Brunei	283.5	2004
84	Oman	281.16	2018
85	India	252.7	2018
86	Kenya	221.39	2010
87	Indonesia	215.99	2018
88	Botswana	185.21	2013
89	Bolivia	163.8	2010
90	Albania	155.53	2008
91	Namibia	149.47	2014
92	Seychelles	146.65	2005
93	Eswatini	142.34	2015
94	Paraguay	139.73	2018
95	Cabo Verde	123.49	2014
96	Iraq	111.14	2018
97	Sri Lanka	106.4	2017
98	Philippines	105.68	2015
99	Zimbabwe	99.52	2012
100	Syrian Arab Republic	90.96	2015
101	Ethiopia	90.53	2017
102	Ghana	89.11	2015
103	Colombia	88.02	2017
104	El Salvador	71.18	2018
105	Nicaragua	70.43	1997
106	Côte d'Ivoire	69.14	2005
107	Nepal	60.67	2002
108	Chad	57.89	2016
109	The Gambia	52.89	2018
110	Malawi	50.35	2010
111	Togo	48.05	2018
112	Burkina Faso	47.58	2010
113	Mozambique	42.97	2015
114	Zambia	41.72	2008
115	Panama	39.11	2013
116	Nigeria	38.79	2007
117	Papua New Guinea	35.49	2016
118	Honduras	34.68	2017
119	Madagascar	34.04	2018
120	Mali	32.86	2017
121	Congo	32.53	2000
122	Cambodia	30.37	2015
123	Myanmar	29.07	2017
124	Uganda	27.84	2014
125	Niger	26.46	2013
126	Lesotho	24.11	2015
127	Burundi	23.44	2018
128	Tanzania	19.15	2013
129	Angola	18.82	2016
130	Lao PDR	15.84	2002
131	Rwanda	13.86	2016
132	Guatemala	12.87	2018
133	Dem. Rep. Congo	10.56	2015

Shwapneel ahnaf 1999 (talk) 00:34, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Oil painting categories you created

Hello, Nutshinou. I noticed that you created quite a few categories under Category:Oil paintings by decade that are still empty. An example is Category:1530s oil paintings. Empty categories are subject to being deleted. Do you plan to populate these categories soon? -- Auntof6 (talk) 06:31, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Auntof6, thank you for asking. These categories should already be populated by the categories in Category:Oil paintings by decade by surface, e.g. you can see Category:1530s oil on canvas paintings and Category:1530s oil on copper paintings are categorized under Category:1530s oil paintings, but they don't show up under that category for some strange reason. Before creating these categories, I edited the templates (like {{OilcanvaspaintingDecade}} and {{OilcopperpaintingDecade}}) to move them from "XXXXs paintings" to "XXXXs oil paintings" then purged the cache for the templates and the "XXXXs oil in X paintings" categories but they never got added to the categories under Category:Oil paintings by decade and I left it like this assuming it would fix itself with time... if you know how to get it to work I would be happy to know. Nutshinou ^Talk! 07:40, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. I will take a look and see what I can do. -- Auntof6 (talk) 07:43, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

OK, I got all but one of them populated. The still-empty one is Category:1440s oil paintings. I don't see anything to put in it. Do you? -- Auntof6 (talk) 08:10, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you, that was really quick! I must've created the category on accident, but I still think it should be kept for easier categorizing in the future so I've added a category and a file to it in hopes that it'll get populated later. Thanks again. Nutshinou ^Talk! 08:30, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Yeah, AWB can help speed things up! Thanks for populating that one. -- Auntof6 (talk) 08:44, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Aexylium Logo.jpg

Hi, Please do not tag a file for speedy deletion when there is a pending permission. Thanks, Yann (talk) 17:25, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

@Yann I do not do that. The permission template was added after I tagged the file. Thanks. Nutshinou ^Talk! 17:27, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Ah OK. Weird. Why did Krd not remove the tag then? Yann (talk) 17:56, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi

Hi 174.117.248.160 21:49, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi

Hello 192.68.163.180 16:09, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Blue Peter logo (2025).png

I noticed you marked this file for speedy deletion. I believe this logo is below the threshold of originality; it only consists of the BBC logo (which itself is under the threshold of originality), the words Blue Peter in a flat blue color, a simple geometric shape (the shield that takes the place of the U) and a silhouette of a ship. This likely falls under the newer threshold of originality in the United Kingdom. COM:TOO UK says: "OK for some simple logos. The level of originality required for copyright protection in the United Kingdom used to be very low. After the 2023 decision of the Court of Appeal in THJ v Sheridan, the test is "more demanding" than the prior one. Now, works that are not "author’s own intellectual creation" are not covered by copyright. See Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2024/12#COM:TOO UK after the THJ v Sheridan decision for some discussion about this test."

I attempted to replace the template with {{subst:DR}} but it didn't seem to do anything. I need help disputing this. Nylix4488 (talk) 13:51, 10 March 2026 (UTC)